Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • Portfolio tests of predicted returns

    February 25, 2013

    Exploring the quality of predictions using random portfolios and optimization. Previously "Simple tests of predicted returns" showed a few ways to look at expected returns at the asset level.  [...]

  • Simple tests of predicted returns

    February 18, 2013

    Some ways to explore how good a method of predicting returns is. Data and model The universe is 443 large cap US stocks that have data back to the [...]

  • R for finance and other upcoming events

    February 12, 2013

    Featured R for Finance Workshop 2013 March 5-6 in London. The target audience are professionals and academics, who wish to learn the basics of the statistical software R and [...]