Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • Variability of predicted portfolio volatility

    February 11, 2013

    A prediction of a portfolio's volatility is an estimate -- how variable is that estimate? Data The universe is 453 large cap US stocks. The variance matrices are estimated [...]

  • An infelicity with Value at Risk

    February 4, 2013

    More risk does not necessarily mean bigger Value at Risk. Previously "The incoherence of risk coherence" suggested that the failure of Value at Risk (VaR) to be coherent is [...]

  • The components garch model in the rugarch package

    January 28, 2013

    How to fit and use the components model. Previously Related posts are: A practical introduction to garch modeling Variability of garch estimates garch estimation on impossibly long series Variance [...]