Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • Clustering and sector strength

    January 21, 2013

    An exploration of the usefulness of sectors. Previously This subject was discussed in "S&P 500 sector strengths". Idea Stocks are put into groups based on the sector that the [...]

  • Market predictions for year 2013

    January 7, 2013

    Calibrations of 2013 predictions for 18 equity indices -- plus some publicly available predictions. Orientation The distributions are an attempt to see the variability if there were no market-driving [...]

  • Miles of iles

    December 24, 2012

    An explanation of quartiles, quintiles deciles, and boxplots. Previously "Again with variability of long-short decile tests" and its predecessor discusses using deciles but doesn't say what they are. The [...]