Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • Variability of garch predictions

    March 17, 2013

    How variable are garch predictions? Previously There have been several posts on garch, in particular: A practical introduction to garch modeling The components garch model in the rugarch package [...]

  • Upcoming events

    March 14, 2013

    Highlighted LondonR is soon -- see the "Previously Announced" section. New Events Thirsty Quants 2013 March 21, London. Some thirsty quants will be going for a drink on the [...]

  • Predicted correlations and portfolio optimization

    March 5, 2013

    What effect do predicted correlations have when optimizing trades? Background A concern about optimization that is not one of "The top 7 portfolio optimization problems" is that correlations spike during [...]