Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • A minimum variance portfolio in 2011

    February 29, 2012

    2011 was a good vintage for minimum variance, at least among stocks in the S&P 500. Previously The post "Realized efficient frontiers" included, of course, a minimum variance portfolio.  [...]

  • Realized efficient frontiers

    February 27, 2012

    A look at the distortion from predicted to realized. The idea The efficient frontier is a mainstay of academic quant.  I've made fun of it before.  This post explores [...]

  • What does ‘passive investing’ really mean?

    February 20, 2012

    We know the words but what do they mean? Some definitions Here are some definitions of "passive investment management". Investopedia says: A style of management associated with mutual and [...]