Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • April 23, 2012

    they ought at least be allowed to state why they didn't do anything and also to explain the process by which they didn't do anything. First blush One of [...]

  • April 16, 2012

    Guiding a ship, it takes more than your skill Spark David Rowe's Risk column this month is about data leverage. The idea is that you are leveraging your data [...]

  • April 4, 2012

    How did the constraints affect portfolio betas, and how did the betas change over time? Previously “Low (and high) volatility strategy effects” created 6 sets of random portfolios -- [...]