Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • LondonR recap

    December 10, 2011

    The biggest and perhaps best meeting yet. The talks James Long: "Easy Parallel Stochastic Simulations using Amazon's EC2 & Segue".  This was a lively talk about James' package to [...]

  • The volatility mystery continues

    December 5, 2011

    How do volatility estimates based on monthly versus daily returns differ? Previously The post "The mystery of volatility estimates from daily versus monthly returns" and its offspring "Another look [...]

  • Alpha decay in portfolios

    November 30, 2011

    How does the effect of our expected returns change over time?  This is not academic  curiosity, we want to know in the context of our portfolio if we can.  [...]