Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • Exponential decay models

    May 17, 2012

    All models are wrong, some models are more wrong than others. The streetlight model Exponential decay models are quite common.  But why? One reason a model might be popular [...]

  • Portfolio diversity

    May 7, 2012

    How many baskets are your eggs in? Meucci diversity Attilio Meucci directly addresses the adage: Don't put all your eggs in one basket. His idea is to think of [...]

  • Cross-sectional skewness and kurtosis: stocks and portfolios

    April 30, 2012

    Not quite expected behavior of skewness and kurtosis. The question In each time period the returns of a universe of stocks will have some distribution -- distributions as displayed [...]