Portfolio optimization inside out

December 21, 2011

A possible way to search for constraints that improve optimization.

The perspective

The usual way of thinking about portfolio optimization is to first consider the utility and then restrict to where the constraints are satisfied.  A perfectly reasonable view.

We use random portfolios to get a different point of view: first ensure that the constraints are satisfied and then look at utility.

The idea

Going down this less travelled road suggests that we might be able to modify the constraints in order to achieve better optimization results.

The presentation

Annotated slides for “Portfolio Optimisation Inside Out” (from my presentation at the Computational and Financial Econometrics conference on Monday) show why the idea might work, and also outline the technique that Portfolio Probe uses to do trade optimization and to generate random portfolios.

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • June 3, 2013

    A look at a paper that explores possible assumption failures of CAPM that would explain the low volatility anomaly. Previously We've talked about CAPM before, in particular: 4 and [...]

  • May 20, 2013

    Under the covers of strange bedfellows. Previously The idea of implied alpha was introduced in "Implied alpha -- almost wordless". In a comment to that post Jeff noticed that [...]

  • May 15, 2013

    Torturing portfolios to give different volatilities between a factor model and Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage. Previously There have been posts on: "What the hell is a variance matrix?" factor models Ledoit-Wolf [...]