Portfolio optimization inside out

December 21, 2011

A possible way to search for constraints that improve optimization.

The perspective

The usual way of thinking about portfolio optimization is to first consider the utility and then restrict to where the constraints are satisfied.  A perfectly reasonable view.

We use random portfolios to get a different point of view: first ensure that the constraints are satisfied and then look at utility.

The idea

Going down this less travelled road suggests that we might be able to modify the constraints in order to achieve better optimization results.

The presentation

Annotated slides for “Portfolio Optimisation Inside Out” (from my presentation at the Computational and Financial Econometrics conference on Monday) show why the idea might work, and also outline the technique that Portfolio Probe uses to do trade optimization and to generate random portfolios.

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • April 1, 2013

    How has the distribution of correlations changed over the last several years? Previously Posts about correlation boxplots explained Data Daily returns of 443 large cap US stocks from 2004 [...]

  • March 17, 2013

    How variable are garch predictions? Previously There have been several posts on garch, in particular: A practical introduction to garch modeling The components garch model in the rugarch package [...]

  • March 5, 2013

    What effect do predicted correlations have when optimizing trades? Background A concern about optimization that is not one of "The top 7 portfolio optimization problems" is that correlations spike during [...]