Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • December 13, 2010

    A friend recently bought The R Book and I said I would tell him of problems that I've noticed with it.  You can eavesdrop. Page 4 The word "library" [...]

  • December 10, 2010

    What would happen if I jumped the turnstile at my local tube station?  Well okay, duck under in my case. Best case: people glare at me like I'm scum.  [...]

  • December 6, 2010

    When were there bear and bull markets in US stocks since 1950? Smoothing While we'd really like to estimate the expected return at each point in time, finding bear [...]