Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • January 26, 2011

    Fundamental Hawk (perusii balancesheetus) Very discriminating in diet.  Often seen scratching in the undergrowth. Subsists on irrationality,  short-lived variety only. Macro Harrier (exsanguinus economicus) Flies very high. Reports of [...]

  • January 24, 2011

    Executive summary: Extremely useful for new users, informative to even quite seasoned users. Refereeing Once upon a time a publisher asked if I would referee a book (unspecified) about [...]

  • January 24, 2011

    Suppose I borrow a dollar from you and I'll pay you 100% interest at the end of the year.  How much money will you have then? $1 * (1 [...]