Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • October 4, 2010

    It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. As you may have guessed, this is a mashup of a novel by Charles Dickens and an [...]

  • September 23, 2010

    Your happiness probably lies outside this book. Fund management If you think this topic remote from fund management, I think you're wrong. Suppose that we deliver a lot of [...]

  • September 13, 2010

    Finance textbooks say that more volatile assets should have higher returns. The volatility puzzle is that that doesn't always hold true.  You should be getting used to textbooks not [...]