The Super Bowl Indicator

February 4, 2011

The Super Bowl will take place on Sunday. This is the final game for American Football (if you have to ask, then: “No, not real football”). Not only is it a highlight in sports, it is also a financial highlight as it determines the fate of the US stock market for the year.

You can see some history of the indicator on the Wall Street Journal blog.

Testing the prediction

Even better, you can read my paper Permuting Super Bowl Theory.

The moral of the story is that the success rate of a prediction can be a deceiving statistic.  There are more specific morals though:

  • success rates are especially deceiving if one choice predominates (this could be a problem for Groundhog Day predictions)
  • be careful not to include in-sample observations
  • be specific about what success means, and use the most useful objective
  • consider how much data snooping was done to find this predictor
  • wonder if it makes sense even if everything else checks out

Epilogue

The time you won your town the race
We chaired you through the market-place;

To an Athlete Dying Young by A. E. Housman

Leave a Reply

  1. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by moneyscience, Patrick Burns. Patrick Burns said: The Super Bowl Indicator http://bit.ly/hvT3zG predicting #finance #markets […]

  2. […] Some thoughts on testing financial predictions.  (Portfolio Probe) […]

Related posts

  • February 20, 2012

    We know the words but what do they mean? Some definitions Here are some definitions of "passive investment management". Investopedia says: A style of management associated with mutual and [...]

  • January 26, 2012

    Conspicuous consumption -- buying what others can't afford -- is a disequilibriating force.  Prices get raised and supply is limited.  The goods that are conspicuously consumed are positional goods. [...]

  • January 11, 2012

    Falkenblog has a post on ecological studies of animal intelligence. The entire post is interesting, but I particularly like his last sentence: [I]f you think that because you have [...]