Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • January 4, 2011

    Here we give details and code for the prediction distributions exhibited in yesterday's blog post "Tis the season to predict". [Revision: There was a problem with the plots published [...]

  • December 30, 2010

    The blog year started in August and consists of 30-something posts.  Here is a summary. Most popular Ideas for World Statistics Day A quant review of "The Quants" by [...]

  • December 27, 2010

    We're really interested in markets, but we'll start with a series of coin tosses.  If the coin lands heads, then we go up one; if it lands tails, we [...]