Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • The number 1 novice quant mistake

    January 12, 2011

    It is ever so easy to make blunders when doing quantitative finance.  Very popular with novices is to analyze prices rather than returns. Regression on the prices When you [...]

  • Some market predictions

    January 6, 2011

    We look at a few forecasts for the year 2011 that we've run across, and compare them with the prediction distributions presented in Revised market prediction distributions. FTSE 100 [...]

  • Revised market prediction distributions

    January 4, 2011

    This provides revised plots of the prediction distributions published yesterday.  The previous plots of prediction distributions should be ignored -- they are not doing as advertised. We show the [...]