Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • A look at Bayesian statistics

    September 3, 2012

    An introduction to Bayesian analysis and why you might care. Fight club The subject of statistics is about how to learn.  Given that it is about the unknown, it [...]

  • garch and long tails

    August 27, 2012

    How much does garch shorten long tails? Previously Pertinent blog posts include: "A practical introduction to garch modeling" "The distribution of financial returns made simple" "Predictability of kurtosis and [...]

  • Another comparison of heuristic optimizers

    August 20, 2012

    A herd of heuristic algorithms is compared using a portfolio optimization. Previously "A comparison of some heuristic optimization methods" used two simple and tiny portfolio optimization problems to compare [...]