Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • September 24, 2012

    What is variance targeting in garch estimation?  And what is its effect? Previously Related posts are: A practical introduction to garch modeling Variability of garch estimates garch estimation on [...]

  • September 20, 2012

    The variability of garch estimates when the series has 100,000 returns. Experiment The post "Variability of garch estimates" showed estimates of 1000 series that were each 2000 observations long.  [...]

  • September 17, 2012

    Not exactly pin-point accuracy. Previously Two related posts are: A practical introduction to garch modeling garch and long tails Experiment 1000 simulated return series were generated.  The garch(1,1) parameters [...]