Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • September 10, 2012

    The paper is "Not Fooled by Randomness: Using Random Portfolios to Analyze Investment Funds" by Roberto Stein.  Here is an explanation of the idea of random portfolios. Favorite sentence [...]

  • September 5, 2012

    Featured Thalesians, London 2012 September 12. Chia Tan on "Practical Financial Modeling". Abstract: Financial modelling is not a competition in the mastery of complexity. Rather, the aim is to [...]

  • September 3, 2012

    An introduction to Bayesian analysis and why you might care. Fight club The subject of statistics is about how to learn.  Given that it is about the unknown, it [...]