Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • October 15, 2012

    The authors are Andrie de Vries and Joris Meys. Executive summary Pretty much all I'd hoped for -- and I had high hopes. Significance The "Dummies" series is popular [...]

  • October 15, 2012

    Here are detailed comments on the book.  Elsewhere there is a review of the book. How to read R For Dummies In order to learn R you need to [...]

  • October 10, 2012

    Which sectors are coherent, and which aren't? Previously The post "S&P 500 correlations up to date" looked at rolling mean correlations among stocks.  In particular it looked at rolling [...]