Searching for inspiration on financial risk

December 13, 2011

Two people, two sources.

Planes

Deus ex Macchiato has a post called “Planes not bridges” in which it is suggested that learning from air traffic investigators makes sense.  The logic is that a large component of plane accidents is caused by human (mis)beliefs.  So perhaps finance can imitate air safety in reducing the frequency of crashes.

Clouds

Meanwhile Andy Haldane in New Scientist (gated version) looks to meteorology as an example of better ways to see a complex process.  If we can forecast global weather, we should be able to forecast financial weather.

The first sentence is:

IT IS said that economists engage in financial forecasting to make astrologers look good.

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • February 4, 2013

    More risk does not necessarily mean bigger Value at Risk. Previously "The incoherence of risk coherence" suggested that the failure of Value at Risk (VaR) to be coherent is [...]

  • January 14, 2013

    What coherent risk measures are, why some people think coherence is important, and why I don't. The rules A risk measure is considered to be coherent if it satisfies [...]

  • December 17, 2012

    Historical Value at Risk (VaR) is very popular because it is easy and intuitive: use the empirical distribution of some specific number of past returns for the portfolio. Previously [...]