Premortem stress tests

June 13, 2011

To look in the corners we want to avoid.

David Rowe’s latest Risk column, “Stress testing culture”, concerns the difficulty of developing good stress scenarios.  One of his particular concerns is that it is against our nature to consider the failure of something that we are working on.  We are masters at dodging that.

There is a (partial) solution.  Guy Kawasaki’s Enchantment (Aleph Blog book review) has a section on premortems.  Postmortems are the process of discovering how something died.  A premortem is the process of hypothesizing how something will have died.

Here’s how it works.  We are given the hypothetical that at some time in the future the product we are working on or the entity we are a part of has died.  We now need to come up with several ways in which this might have happened.

The psychological spell of denial is broken because we are given the death as a done deal.  That gives us the freedom to ferret about for the weakest spots.

You can see a bit more on premortems in the Harvard Business Review article by Gary Klein.

Epilogue

You’re spellbound baby there’s no doubting that
Did you ever see a stare like a Persian cat?

from “Deep Dark Truthful Mirror” by Declan MacManus

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • August 26, 2013

    How does Value at Risk change through time for the same portfolio? Previously There has been a number of posts on Value at Risk, including a basic introduction to [...]

  • June 16, 2013

    Getting Expected Shortfall given the standard deviation or Value at Risk. Previously There have been a few posts about Value at Risk and Expected Shortfall. Properties of the stable [...]

  • May 28, 2013

    More accurate than historical, simpler than garch. Previously We've discussed exponential smoothing in "Exponential decay models". The same portfolios were submitted to the same sort of analysis in "A [...]