Portfolio optimization inside out

December 21, 2011

A possible way to search for constraints that improve optimization.

The perspective

The usual way of thinking about portfolio optimization is to first consider the utility and then restrict to where the constraints are satisfied.  A perfectly reasonable view.

We use random portfolios to get a different point of view: first ensure that the constraints are satisfied and then look at utility.

The idea

Going down this less travelled road suggests that we might be able to modify the constraints in order to achieve better optimization results.

The presentation

Annotated slides for “Portfolio Optimisation Inside Out” (from my presentation at the Computational and Financial Econometrics conference on Monday) show why the idea might work, and also outline the technique that Portfolio Probe uses to do trade optimization and to generate random portfolios.

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • May 9, 2012

    The minimum variance portfolios have slightly reduced correlations to assets in weight-constrained portfolios. Previously "Portfolio diversity" introduced the topic of asset-portfolio correlations. It also generated four sets of long-only [...]

  • May 8, 2012

    Constraining the maximum asset-portfolio correlation gave bigger returns and smaller volatility. Previously "Portfolio diversity" introduced the topic of asset-portfolio correlations.  It also generated four sets of long-only random portfolios [...]

  • May 7, 2012

    How many baskets are your eggs in? Meucci diversity Attilio Meucci directly addresses the adage: Don't put all your eggs in one basket. His idea is to think of [...]