Portfolio optimization inside out

December 21, 2011

A possible way to search for constraints that improve optimization.

The perspective

The usual way of thinking about portfolio optimization is to first consider the utility and then restrict to where the constraints are satisfied.  A perfectly reasonable view.

We use random portfolios to get a different point of view: first ensure that the constraints are satisfied and then look at utility.

The idea

Going down this less travelled road suggests that we might be able to modify the constraints in order to achieve better optimization results.

The presentation

Annotated slides for “Portfolio Optimisation Inside Out” (from my presentation at the Computational and Financial Econometrics conference on Monday) show why the idea might work, and also outline the technique that Portfolio Probe uses to do trade optimization and to generate random portfolios.

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • October 29, 2012

    Should you use daily or monthly returns to estimate volatility? Does garch explain why volatility estimated with daily data tends to be bigger than if it is estimated with [...]

  • October 10, 2012

    Which sectors are coherent, and which aren't? Previously The post "S&P 500 correlations up to date" looked at rolling mean correlations among stocks.  In particular it looked at rolling [...]

  • October 8, 2012

    I haven't heard much about correlation lately.  I was curious about what it's been doing. Data The dataset is daily log returns on 464 large cap US stocks from [...]