Statistical construction error

August 20, 2011

Yes, the title is meant to have two readings.

The effect

The Numbers Guy, among other examples, talks about the UK Office for National Statistics needing to revise its estimate for the construction sector output because of an error.

Original: 2.3% growth

Corrected: 0.5% growth

Here is the Telegraph article cited by The Numbers Guy.

The cause

The spreadsheet that is used to calculate the statistic was not updated properly.

Questions

Have they not read “Spreadsheet Addiction”?

Why are they not using R?

Does this scare anybody else?

Epilogue

Who would take the repercussions when the bottle is to blame?

from “Down the Mountain” by Robin E. Contreras

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Latest posts

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • Random input software testing

    August 23, 2011

    The usual approach to testing software is to create a specific problem and see if the software gets the correct answer.  Although this is very useful, there are problems [...]

  • A view of useR!2011

    August 22, 2011

    Start Brian Ripley The conference was opened with a talk by Brian Ripley.  I'll distort his talk into 3 points that came across to me. 1. R Core is [...]

  • The indices understate the carnage

    August 9, 2011

    The first 6 trading days of August have been bad for the major indices, but how variable is that across portfolios? To answer that, two sets of random portfolios [...]