Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • March 5, 2012

    How wide is the darkness? Uses of models The main way models are used is to: shine light on the "truth" We create and use a model to learn [...]

  • February 29, 2012

    2011 was a good vintage for minimum variance, at least among stocks in the S&P 500. Previously The post "Realized efficient frontiers" included, of course, a minimum variance portfolio.  [...]

  • February 27, 2012

    A look at the distortion from predicted to realized. The idea The efficient frontier is a mainstay of academic quant.  I've made fun of it before.  This post explores [...]