Physical economy v social economy

September 17, 2010

There’s a hole in the bucket of traditional economics. Homo socialus seems to be on the rise, and homo economicus is getting harder to find.

Vulcanism has become evident in the R community over the last several days.  One of the visible eruptions has been over money.  This resulted in a blog post by Tal Galili Why R developers shouldn’t be paid that includes three great videos.

This matters to fund management.  If your theory maintains that Wikipedia can’t even exist, then your predictions for Microsoft’s encyclopedia might be slightly off.

I must admit that I’m quite confused by the whole issue.  I don’t think the world is going to go back to “normal” though just because I don’t understand.

Leave a Reply

  1. Tal Galili 2010-09-17 at 08:58 - Reply

    Thank you for the link, and the intellectual honesty regarding your confusion – we are on the same boat.

    p.s: install the WP plugin subscribe to comments.

    Cheers 🙂
    Tal

Related posts

  • March 5, 2013

    What effect do predicted correlations have when optimizing trades? Background A concern about optimization that is not one of "The top 7 portfolio optimization problems" is that correlations spike during [...]

  • February 25, 2013

    Exploring the quality of predictions using random portfolios and optimization. Previously "Simple tests of predicted returns" showed a few ways to look at expected returns at the asset level.  [...]

  • February 18, 2013

    Some ways to explore how good a method of predicting returns is. Data and model The universe is 443 large cap US stocks that have data back to the [...]