More S&P 500 correlation

July 28, 2011

Here are some additions to the previous post on S&P 500 correlation.

Correlation distribution

Before we only looked at mean correlations.  However, it is possible to see more of the distribution than just the mean.  Figures 1 and 2 show several quantiles: 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 90%.

Figure 1: Quantiles of 50-day rolling correlation of S&P 500 constituents to the index. Figure 2: Quantiles of intra-constituent 50-day correlations. I don’t see anything special going on recently (this is still with data that ends July 15).  Mid 2008 is interesting though: the small correlations got very small until Lehman came along.

Correlation uncertainty

Last time we used the statistical bootstrap to investigate variability.  That was fine for thinking about the variability from constituents.  However, it is reasonably unintuitive when looking at the variability due to different days.

Another approach is to look at what happens when we leave out one observation at a time.  In statistical terminology this is the “jackknife” — it was used before the bootstrap came along.

Figure 3 shows the range of the 50 jackknifed results at each time point for the mean correlation among the constituents.  We’re making a very small change here — dropping one day out of 50 — yet the result can move a non-trivial amount.

Figure 3: Leave-one-out range of mean intra-constituent 50-day correlations. Figure 4 shows how the width of the jackknife range changes through time.

Figure 4: Width of the jackknife range for mean 50-day intra-constituent correlation.

Appendix R

Two additional functions were written for this post.  They are:

> pp.quan.const.cor
function (x, probs, window=50, index=1)
{
  x <- x[, -index]   ans <- x[, 1:length(probs)]   colnames(ans) <- probs
  ans[] <- NA
  wseq <- (1-window):0
  lt <- lower.tri(diag(ncol(x)), diag=FALSE)
  for(i in window:nrow(x)) {
    ans[i,] <- quantile(cor(x[wseq+i,])[lt], probs=probs)
  }
  ans[-1:(1-window),] }

> pp.jackknife.const.cor
function (x, window=50, index=1)
{
  x <- x[, -index]   ans <- x[, 1:2]   ans[] <- NA
  wseq <- (1-window):0
  lt <- lower.tri(diag(ncol(x)), diag=FALSE)
  jknife <- numeric(window)
  jseq <- 1:window
  for(i in window:nrow(x)) {
    xw <- x[wseq+i,]     jknife[] <- NA
    for(j in jseq) {
      jknife[j] <- mean(cor(xw[-j,])[lt])
    }
    ans[i,] <- range(jknife)
  }
  ans[-1:(1-window),] }

Each of these is assuming that the first column of the data holds the index returns.

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • January 6, 2014

    The S&P 500 returned 29.6% in 2013.  How might that have varied? S&P weights There are many features that could vary -- here we will keep the same constituents [...]

  • December 30, 2013

    Highlights of the blog over the past year. Most popular posts The posts with the most hits during the year. A practical introduction to garch modeling (posted in 2012) A [...]

  • December 23, 2013

    Additional views of the stability of skewness and kurtosis of equity portfolios. Previously A post called "Four moments of portfolios" introduced the idea of looking at the stability of [...]