Market arrows

June 16, 2011

Graphs like Figure 1 are reasonably common.  But they are not reasonable.

Figure 1: A (log) price series with an explicit guide line. Some have the prices on a logarithmic scale, which is an improvement on the raw prices.

The problem with this sort of plot is that two particular data points are taken as special.  These two points are essentially assumed to have no error.  The plot then invites the observer to project — under false pretenses — into the future.

There is also a substantial amount of self-censoring with these plots.  I suspect you are very unlikely to see any plots that look like Figure 2.

Figure 2: Another log price series with explicit guide line.

Questions

Is there a name for this type of plot?

Appendix R

Though the plots are not useful, the technique to make them in R can be useful.  The basic trick is to add a polygon to the existing plot.

The function that created the figures is pp.timelinefill. You can get it into your R session with the command:

source("https://www.portfolioprobe.com/R/blog/pp.timelinefill.R")

Epilogue

I can saw a woman in two
But you won’t want to look in the box when I do

from “For my next trick I’ll need a volunteer” by Warren Zevon

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

Related posts

  • May 28, 2013

    More accurate than historical, simpler than garch. Previously We've discussed exponential smoothing in "Exponential decay models". The same portfolios were submitted to the same sort of analysis in "A [...]

  • May 20, 2013

    Under the covers of strange bedfellows. Previously The idea of implied alpha was introduced in "Implied alpha -- almost wordless". In a comment to that post Jeff noticed that [...]

  • May 15, 2013

    Torturing portfolios to give different volatilities between a factor model and Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage. Previously There have been posts on: "What the hell is a variance matrix?" factor models Ledoit-Wolf [...]