garch estimation on impossibly long series

September 20, 2012

The variability of garch estimates when the series has 100,000 returns.

Experiment

The post “Variability of garch estimates” showed estimates of 1000 series that were each 2000 observations long.  Here we do the same thing except that the series each have 100,000 observations.

That would be four centuries of daily data.  It’s not presently feasible to think of  a market mechanism being stable for that long.

For 1-minute returns, that is only a year of data.  Hence we could actually gather such data and feed it to a garch estimator.  The problem here is that there is significant seasonality in volatility throughout the trading day.  So to get viable results we would need a more complicated model than a garch(1,1) with t-distributed errors.

Pictures

The figures show the distributions of the estimates of:

  1. alpha and beta
  2. the half-life
  3. the degrees of freedom of the t distribution
  4. the asymptotic variance

Figure 1: Smoothed scatterplot of the alpha and beta estimates.

Figure 2: Distribution of the estimated half-life.

Figure 3: Distribution of estimated degrees of freedom.

Figure 4: Distribution of estimated asymptotic variance.

The variability in the estimate of the asymptotic variance is perhaps surprisingly high.

Appendix R

The command (see “Variability of garch estimates”  for more details) to do the estimation was:

> system.time(ges.a.100K.07 <- pp.garchEstSim(c(.01, .07, .925),
+        spec=tspec, nobs=1e5, df=7, trials=1000))
    user   system  elapsed 
28445.89  2634.36 32473.76

That is 9 hours of elapsed time.

Leave a Reply

  1. stu 2012-09-20 at 14:49 - Reply

    “That would be four centuries of daily data. It’s not presently feasible to think of a market mechanism being stable for that long.”

    Very true! Way to think about it that way.

  2. Robert Young 2012-09-20 at 20:11 - Reply

    Depending on how one defines “stable”, the market for specie can be arguably stable for millennia.

  3. […] ← Horses and volatility garch estimation on impossibly long series → […]

Related posts

  • May 2, 2011

    Hell is new and improved. The R Inferno has been revised.  If you don't know of it, it is a short explanation of a few trouble spots when using [...]

  • April 28, 2011

    Statistical factor models and Ledoit-Wolf shrinkage are competing methods for estimating variance matrices of returns.  So which is better?  This adds a data point for answering that question. Previously [...]

  • April 21, 2011

    What is the effect on predicted and realized volatility of substituting risk fraction constraints for weight constraints? Previously This post depends on two previous blog posts: "Unproxying weight constraints" [...]