The good side of inside trading

November 30, 2010

All About Alpha has a post called Insider traders: rogues or whistleblowers?

It is a pleasantly disturbing look at insider trading in that it challenges the reflex reaction that inside trading is all bad.  In particular the final paragraph discusses an interesting inconsistency.

One issue that is highlighted is that it is harder for negative news to come out and be priced in.  Apropos of this is the quote:

Lambert goes on to say that the resulting overvaluation of stocks (which is supported by existing management incentives and investment industry apparatus), is actually more harmful to society than the potential under-valuations that could occur if insider trading was allowed in “price decreasing” situations.

I’m not sure what scheme is imagined for price-decreasing insider trading, but I think there could be a problem.

When I worked at a bank, I was restricted from shorting stock in the bank.  While I would have liked to have been able to short the stock, I was pleased that presumably everyone else who worked there was banned from shorting it.  If you have a large enough short position and a powerful enough lever, losing your job will be of little consequence.

Leave a Reply

  1. […] The good side of inside trading points to an article that shows  inside trading to be a more ambiguous subject than we would expect. […]

Related posts

  • April 21, 2012

    The focus on tracking error rules out a low volatility strategy. Simply put, most money managers are focused on outperforming their benchmarks without adding risk. And because risk is [...]

  • April 2, 2012

    If equity markets suddenly sprang into existence now, would we create market indices? I'm doubtful. Why an index? The Dow Jones Industrial Average was born in 1896.  This was [...]

  • March 16, 2012

    The pro and con of fundamental indexing. Last Tuesday the London Quant Group sponsored a boxing match between forces for and against fundamental indexing.  Adam Olive was in the [...]