The good side of inside trading

November 30, 2010

All About Alpha has a post called Insider traders: rogues or whistleblowers?

It is a pleasantly disturbing look at insider trading in that it challenges the reflex reaction that inside trading is all bad.  In particular the final paragraph discusses an interesting inconsistency.

One issue that is highlighted is that it is harder for negative news to come out and be priced in.  Apropos of this is the quote:

Lambert goes on to say that the resulting overvaluation of stocks (which is supported by existing management incentives and investment industry apparatus), is actually more harmful to society than the potential under-valuations that could occur if insider trading was allowed in “price decreasing” situations.

I’m not sure what scheme is imagined for price-decreasing insider trading, but I think there could be a problem.

When I worked at a bank, I was restricted from shorting stock in the bank.  While I would have liked to have been able to short the stock, I was pleased that presumably everyone else who worked there was banned from shorting it.  If you have a large enough short position and a powerful enough lever, losing your job will be of little consequence.

Leave a Reply

  1. […] The good side of inside trading points to an article that shows  inside trading to be a more ambiguous subject than we would expect. […]

Related posts

  • February 25, 2011

    There is a deep connection between political mechanisms and economic mechanisms, at least according to Ajay Shah. Price flexibility Ajay Shah has a post called Jittery regimes fix prices. [...]

  • February 17, 2011

    High volatility stocks are, in general, nonsensical.  Who's to blame? The high vol gamble Theory says that investors demand higher returns for higher volatility assets.  Reality says that the [...]

  • February 4, 2011

    The Super Bowl will take place on Sunday. This is the final game for American Football (if you have to ask, then: "No, not real football"). Not only is [...]