Primitive stock markets

November 15, 2010

There are two types of technology:

  • Good (does exactly as wanted, with no hassle)
  • Primitive (all the rest)

This classification has been instilled into me by my wife.

The stock market is primitive.

Unbroken history

Current stock markets are not much different than when the New York Stock Exchange was the shade of a buttonwood tree.

Figure 1: Buttonwood tree phase of NYSE (via Wikipedia)

We now have at our command amazing machines.  Perhaps there are some machines that can be glued together to produce a better market mechanism.

The hassles

One of the primary tasks of a market is price discovery.  I find it hard to believe that this is done efficiently now.  Flash crashes seem a counter-example.  It isn’t clear that a better market would get rid of excess volatility but it might reduce it some.

Any solutions out there?

I don’t actually know what I’m asking for.  I’m just hypothesizing that something better could be made.

The only idea I’ve come up with is the possibility of the market operating on discrete time rather than continuous time.  When I searched for that I found this Deus ex Macchiato post on Discrete, discreet trading.

Questions

Surely there are people pondering this.  Who are they? What are they thinking?

Subscribe to the Portfolio Probe blog by Email

Leave a Reply

  1. Pat 2010-11-26 at 08:59 - Reply

    Here is a link to a project that seems apropos: challenges and opportunities of computer trading.

  2. R. Shaw 2011-02-05 at 05:37 - Reply

    I think that the market would be fairer with “discrete, discreet trading” (but because of that, it would be opposed by powerful interests, such HFTers). The matching rules could be similar to the stock market opening rules, which actually is a demand-balancing price-discovery process. It should not be pulsed too frequently, but much more often than the “morning-fixing” and “afternoon-fixing” of older markets.

    • Pat 2011-02-05 at 10:05 - Reply

      I agree with both these points.

      I’ve been thinking that if this happens at all, then it will probably be an emerging market that does it first. Those markets aren’t going to have such engrained high frequency traders. It might then spread to established markets.

      What is in my head is a go something like every 5 or 10 minutes.

Related posts

  • April 21, 2012

    The focus on tracking error rules out a low volatility strategy. Simply put, most money managers are focused on outperforming their benchmarks without adding risk. And because risk is [...]

  • April 2, 2012

    If equity markets suddenly sprang into existence now, would we create market indices? I'm doubtful. Why an index? The Dow Jones Industrial Average was born in 1896.  This was [...]

  • March 16, 2012

    The pro and con of fundamental indexing. Last Tuesday the London Quant Group sponsored a boxing match between forces for and against fundamental indexing.  Adam Olive was in the [...]